Retrieved from riskheadquarters.Bleeding edge is part pun and part ranking of the readiness of the technology for market. Leading Edge Technology is not always Bleeding Edge Technology.
Cutting Edge versus Bleeding Edge Technology.
#LEADING EDGE VS BLEEDING EDGE UPGRADE#
Therefore, in order to prevent the consumers for the issue of bleeding edge technology and leading technology, the rule to follow is, only upgrade for a required new feature, it always pays to be patient with it comes to technology. The only good time to be the a guinea pig is when it’s free, but remember you get what you pay for, and then you are referred to as a beta-tester willing to work for free. Were as bleeding edge technology implies pain and suffering while using the new product that may not be completely ready for public use. Leading edge technology implies a new product that is revolutionary when compared to previous products. Now not to be to negative, it is nice to have the latest and greatest, but there is a fine line between bleeding edge technology and leading edge technology. For a large corporation a purchase of a unproven product could prove to be costly. The key to bleeding technology and leading technology, while it might be popular to have the latest product, the truth be told it is no prize for being the guinea pig. Remember Microsoft’s Vista, talk about a white elephant in the room and being force to keep it around a day longer than you planned? The first version of the iPhone required you to log-on to the internet on your computer to see the picture text message. The first version of the iPhone did not have a lot of the features that regular cell phones had, like picture text messaging. Like with cars the first hybrid were not as economical as they were made to appear. The Bottom Line Never be the first to upgrade or buy the first model of anything. Therefore the advertisement states that it is faster, and that is true and the cost and limited availability of the native applications makes this a good investment, therefore turning this bleeding edge technology into a leading edge technology.
#LEADING EDGE VS BLEEDING EDGE SOFTWARE#
The software company never invested in the 64-bit technology, but instead made their current 32-bit applications work in the 64-bit. The operating systems are currently out there, however, there is a lag in the industry to move to 64-bit. There is one such bleeding edge technology product that comes to mind that is still waiting on it day, that is the 64-bit Hardware/software. The bleeding edge consumer has also taken all the risk associated with purchasing a bleeding edge product. After Implementation After adoption of a new technology there is always a chance of a price drop once the technology goes worldwide, but the consumer that purchased the product when it was classified as bleeding edge has served as the shack out provider. Understand that once you have implemented the new product of brought into new technology there could be no turning back, as lease for a period of time. The cost is not the only dangers the consumer faces when selecting a bleeding edge product, there is the chance of be stuck with the white elephant in the room. There have been rewards for successful implementing early adoption of a new computer product, but you have to keep in mind the lifecycle could be longer and sticking with the current standard product. This in turn can cost the use in productivity, but mostly it could cost them more in the long term than that of the tried-and-true technologies of current day. This is because bleeding edge is a technology that is so new that the end-use may be at risk when it comes to the stability of the technology. However, being on the bleeding edge could cost and most often turn into a not so good thing. Bleeding, Leading Edge When it comes to computer, being on the leading edge of technology can be a good thing. Consumers expect their computer’s to last for years, and the through to the computer becoming obsolete right after the purchase has led consumers to make illogical decisions.
0 kommentar(er)
